PLB stands for Personal Locator Beacon. About a year ago, after giving it a lot of thought and after doing a lot of research, I bought a GPS-Enabled 406 MHz PLB: the one I chose is an ACR ResQLink. So why didn’t I buy a SPOT, instead? Over the past month, I’ve had a number of hikers ask me that question and I’ve given them the reasons based on my research.
Given all the questions, I thought it might be a good idea to post my research and reasons on my blog where it’s easily accessible to others who might find it helpful. This is a hiking blog and since, for me, the purpose of a personal locator beacon is to get rescued, I will only focus on features related to emergency distress signals.
First things first: 1) What is a PLB?, and 2) What is a SPOT Messenger?
1. A PLB is a battery-powered, electronic device-of-last-resort that, when activated, will attempt to send a distress signal, along with your GPS location information, to a satellite for the purpose of notifying local search-and-rescue of a life-threatening emergency to you (or someone in your hiking group) with the implied need for an immediate rescue.
2. A SPOT Messenger (hereinafter as SPOT) is a battery-powered, electronic device-of-last-resort and a messaging device-of-first-resort that, when activated, will attempt to send a variety of custom, pre-programmed text and/or e-mail messages (such as Help/Assist, OK/Custom, Track Progress), depending on your subscription plan(s) to a satellite for the purpose of notifying personal contacts of your status — OR — will attempt to send an SOS distress signal, along with your GPS location information, to a satellite for the purpose of notifying local search-and-rescue of a life-threatening emergency to you (or someone in your hiking group) with the implied need for an immediate rescue.
Based on the feature set alone, you would think SPOT was the clear choice and hikers should rush out and buy one. From a marketing perspective, I suspect that is exactly what SPOT wants you to think… and do. But dig a little deeper and you will find technical differences between a PLB and SPOT that should be seriously considered before deciding which unit is best for you.
Disclaimer #1: I am not an engineer so everything that follows is based on my interpretation of the information I found during my research. Please do your own due diligence prior to making your purchase.
Disclaimer #2: I do not work for ACR Electronics, the manufacturer of the ACR ResQLink, nor was I recruited (remunerated) by ACR Electronics to write (for writing) this article.
Okay… here we go.
Making Waves
Both units transmit their signal in the Ultra High Frequency (UHF) range, which is a range set by the International Telecommunication Union that governs the transmission of electromagnetic waves within the 300MHz to 3GHz range… or to keep it apples-to-apples, from 300MHz to 3,000MHz.
Among other things, an electromagnetic wave has a given (wave) length based on its frequency. The higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength. The lower the frequency, the longer the wavelength.
Why is wavelength important? Because, among other things, wavelength determines transmission distance and penetrating power of the signal. In general, longer wavelengths travel farther and have more penetrating power than shorter wavelengths.
The ACR ResQLink transmits at 406MHz, which is at the lower end of the UHF spectrum, and has a wavelength a little less than 2.46 feet (75 centimeters). The SPOT transmits at 1,600 MHz, which is in the middle of the UHF spectrum, and has a wavelength of 0.62 feet (18.8 centimeters).
Bottom Line: The ACR ResQLink’s lower-frequency wavelength is almost four times longer than SPOT’s higher-frequency wavelength. Not only that, but the 406 MHz frequency used by the ACR ResQlink is an internationally recognized, satellite-based, search-and-rescue, distress-alert frequency.
.
I Got No Power
Wavelength is not all that determines the distance a signal will travel. Signal power also determines distance. Both the ACR ResQLink and SPOT transmit at a given power and that power is measured in watts. Since electromagnetic waves are subject to the laws of physics, every obstacle the signal encounters on its journey to the satellite (tree cover, cloud cover, rain, snow, etc.) weakens the signal. Therefore, stronger power at the source will give the signal more momentum, allow it to lose some power as it negotiates obstacles, and still retain enough signal strength to arrive at the receiving satellite.
The ACR ResQLink transmits at 5 watts. The SPOT transmits at 0.5 watts.
Bottom Line: The ACR ResQLink transmission is 10 times more powerful than SPOT’s transmission.
.
My Antenna is Longer Than Your Antenna
The ACR ResQLink’s antenna is 10.5 inches long, protects the activation button when wrapped around the unit, and is designed to be deployed, and the unit activated, using only one hand. The SPOT’s antenna is underneath the cover plate and doesn’t have to be deployed, so I assume it is much shorter.
Does it matter?
The National Forest Service did a study on SPOT. They determined the SPOT unit must be oriented with the front cover facing skyward for best results. Otherwise, satellite connection may be impaired or even lost. Given the shape of a SPOT unit, that means you would have to carry it laying flat on top of your shoulder or laying flat on top of your pack. However, if you are not paying for continuous GPS tracking and are only using it as a pseudo-PLB, how you carry it may not be an issue, as long you orient it properly during messaging and for activation.
Bottom Line: Your best judgement.
.
My Satellite Network and Rescue Protocol Is More Sophisticated Than Your Satellite Network and Rescue Protocol
The ACR ResQLink interacts with the Cospas-Sarsat satellite system and must be registered with NOAA. Once registered, NOAA will send you a sticker (with your registration information) that must be placed on the unit. It is against the law to use a PLB without first registering the device. Once a PLB is activated, a military-like response protocol is set in motion. Other than replacing the batteries (see below), there are no subscription or recurring fees of any kind.
From NOAA:
“Cospas-Sarsat is an international, humanitarian search and rescue system that uses satellites to detect and locate emergency beacons carried by ships, aircraft, or individuals. The system consists of a network of satellites, ground stations, mission control centers, and rescue coordination centers.”
“When an emergency beacon is activated, the signal is received by a satellite and relayed to the nearest available ground station. The ground station, called a Local User Terminal, processes the signal and calculates the position from which it originated. This position is transmitted to a mission control center where it is joined with identification data and other information on that beacon. The mission control center then transmits an alert message to the appropriate rescue coordination center based on the geographic location of the beacon. If the location of the beacon is in another country’s area of responsibility, then the alert is transmitted to that country’s mission control center.”
From what I have read, the Cospas-Sarsat satellite orbits are such that once you activate the ACR ResQLink, a Cospas-Sarsat satellite will receive that signal almost instantly and the search-and-rescue team responsible for your location can be notified in as little as five minutes.
A Cospas-Sarsat satellite does not require both the PLB and the ground station to be in simultaneous contact in order to receive the distress signal. The satellite can receive and store the distress signal and pass it on when the ground station comes into contact.
Plus, the Cospas-Sarsat system in the US is monitored by NOAA and the United States Air Force and they are known to interact effectively with search-and-rescue operations.
SPOT interacts with the commercial, GEOS satellite system by way of contract with GEOS Alliance. Registration with NOAA is not available, but activation/registratiopn with SPOT is required for the unit to work. Activation is accomplished by purchasing a basic service plan, paid annually. There are add-on service plans available that can cost you an additional $13-50 each, paid annually. Once the SPOT SOS signal is activated, a response protocol determined by SPOT and GEOS Alliance is set in motion (see their escape clause, below).
From SPOT:
- GPS satellites provide signals
- SPOT messenger’s onboard GPS chip determines your GPS location and sends your location and preselected message to communication satellites
- Communication satellites relay your message to specific satellite antennas around the world
- Satellite antennas and a global network route your location and message to the appropriate network
- Your location and messages are delivered according to your instructions via email, text message, or emergency notification to the GEOS Rescue Coordination Center
As I understand, the GEOS command center is located in Houston, Texas and a GEOS satellite must have both the SPOT transmitter and the command center in simultaneous contact in order to relay the distress signal. I have also read that with the GEOS satellite orbits, it can take as long as 45 minutes for messages and/or a distress signal to be sent.
Also, from what I have read, the GEOS command center has a reputation of not interacting well with search-and-rescue operations. In fact, in the SPOT Terms and Conditions agreement, they have an escape clause which specifically states, “Should GEOS have reasonable cause to believe that an emergency condition does not exist, GEOS reserves the right to solely contact the primary and secondary contacts identified by you.”
Let me see if I’ve got that right: So if I hit the SOS button on my SPOT, rather than assume I am having a real, life-threatening emergency and then automatically and unquestionably alert search-and-rescue on my behalf, the employees of GEOS Alliance, who have absolutely no idea of my situation or why I sent an SOS, are allowed to determine whether they believe I am having a real emergency… or not… and whether they will contact search-and-rescue for me… or not? Excuse me!!!!! What the…
Hang tight, I will give you a SPOT Reality Check at the end of this article where the GEOS Alliance decided not to alert search-and-rescue after an SOS signal was received with tragic consequences.
As far as I am concerned, the escape clause in SPOT’s Terms and Conditions is reason enough to avoid SPOT.
Bottom Line: Yes, IMO, the satellite network and rescue protocol used by the ACR ResQLink is far superior to SPOT’s.
.
Other Points To Consider
GPS Information
Both units transmit GPS location information along with the distress signal. However, if, for some reason, the GPS information can not be transmitted, it is my understanding that Cospas-Sarsat can use something similar to triangulation to determine your location. GEOS has no such capability; however, if you are paying for continuous tracking, GEOS would have your last known GPS location. This “last known location” is also part of the SPOT Reality Check at the end of this post.
Bottom Line: Even
.
Battery Life and Replacement
The ACR ResQLink uses primary lithium batteries. Once activated, the ACR ResQLink can transmit a distress signal and a homing signal for 24 hours.
The ACR ResQLink’s batteries must be replaced every five years or after each emergency use. Unfortunately, the batteries are deemed not to be user-replaceable. This is a major negative to owning an ACR ResQLink because the manufacturer insists you send the unit to an authorized service center for battery replacement. The service center also inspects and tests the unit to make certain it will last another five years.
So you have to live without your PLB for how ever long it takes to get the unit back from the service center and, from what I’ve read, they will charge you a whopping $150 for the pleasure of doing business with them. If that amount is correct, I think that is an outrageous amount of money to pay for a new battery and for testing the unit. Plus, you have to pay for shipping and insurance, too. Oh, well, it is what it is. 😦
I have no doubt that someone in cyber-ville will find a way to put new batteries in their ACR ResQLink on their own and for a fraction of the cost. And when they do, I expect they will post the procedure online. I hope that happens before I need new batteries… after four more years… or after one rescue.
To their credit, SPOT uses typical AAA batteries. Once the SOS is activated, and with fully charged batteries, SPOT can transmit a distress signal for six days (with clear view of sky and proper orientation) and for three days (with 50% view of sky). The longer transmission time is due to SPOT’s low power rating (see I Got No Power, above). Another thing to keep in mind: If you are paying for continuous GPS tracking and/or you are sending OK messages, your battery life, and thus your distress signal transmission time, will be negatively impacted, so it would be wise to carry extra batteries.
Bottom Line: SPOT’s use of AAA batteries is much a better deal for the consumer… with the above caveat.
=============================
Update: December, 2017
Well, that someone in cyber-ville turned out to be… me! 🙂 Yes, I am at the five-year mark and my ACR ResQLink PLB will need a new battery pack by Spring of 2018. I have opened my unit and figured out the battery thing. I am now looking at spot welders, along with all the other gear required to make my own battery pack. Unless something changes, I should be operational and have a new battery pack installed by March, 2018. When I get to that point, I might as well sell battery packs to others who own an ACR ResQLink, as well. And I can tell you this: I will charge a fair price, as low a price as I possibly can, maybe as little as a third of what ACR charges, so other ACR ResQLink owners don’t have to pay that outrageous $150 to get a new battery pack. And the battery pack will use high-quality Panasonic Lithium batteries, the very same batteries that are in my unit right now. So stay tuned. I will post updates here on my blog when I get to that point.
=============================
Update: January, 2018
This PLB has three, 3 volt, Panasonic CR123A, primary (single use, non-rechargeable) lithium manganese dioxide batteries wired in series. Pulled the shrink wrap off the battery pack and one of the batteries in my unit is clearly stamped as being good until February, 2022. Not sure about the other two because, the way the batteries are glued together, I can’t see those dates. These batteries are supposed to have a 10 year shelf life, which suggests a manufacture date of February, 2012. ACR says you have to replace the batteries six years after manufacture date… or five years after install. Is that just a CYA recommendation, or did they mix batteries with different dates, or am I missing something?
The only time my PLB has been used is the one test I do at the beginning of each Spring, but that only lasts a few seconds. It doesn’t seem like that annual test, which does light up the strobe a few times, is enough to reduce the life of 10 year batteries by almost half. Plus, a PLB should have zero drain at idle, so why does ACR recommend replacing 10 year batteries five years after install? And other than the annual test, self-discharge would be the only other area of possible concern, but primary lithium batteries only have a self-discharge rate of less than 1% per month. Since I have no knowledge about anything electrical, it’s all a bit perplexing.
I did check the individual cells of my battery pack with a simple battery tester and all three cells showed good (half way into the green). Unfortunately, that doesn’t really give you an indication of remaining battery life. In fact, from what I’ve read so far, the internal chemistry differences of primary lithium batteries makes it difficult, if not impossible, to accurately determine remaining battery life. For the time being, I will continue to use this battery pack while I do more research on primary lithium batteries.
=============================
.
Homing Signal
In addition to a distress signal, the ACR ResQLink transmits a low-frequency homing signal at 121.5 MHz. SPOT does not transmit a homing signal.
Bottom Line: The ACR ResQLink gets a minor nod (for hiking only) because the search-and-rescue team must have the equipment to home in on the signal. In hiking, for the most part, search-and-rescue comes in on foot and I have never heard of a search-and-rescue ground team that carries the equipment needed to home in on this type of signal.
.
Weight and Form Factor
The ACR ResQLink comes in two flavors: One floats. One doesn’t float. Both have waterproof housings.
The one that floats (above, right) is 1.6 x 1.9 x 4.5” (4.1 x 4.8 x 11.4 cm) and weighs 5.4 oz (153 g)
The one that doesn’t float (above, left) is 1.3 x 1.9 x 3.9” (3.3 x 4.8 x 9.9 cm) and weighs 4.6 oz (130 g)
As a hiker, I really don’t need a PLB that floats. However, after thinking about how I wanted to carry my PLB, I bought the one that floats because it has two slots, one at the top and one at the bottom, and comes with a Velcro strap. This allows me to hang the unit from the left shoulder strap of my pack, which I find preferable to putting the unit in some type of zippered case or carrying it in my pocket. Plus, if I were to have a serious accident, I want the unit to be easily accessible so I can reach it and activate it with only one hand. I don’t want to be lying there hurt and have to fumble around trying to get the unit out of a zippered case or my pocket and then maybe dropping it where it’s impossible for me to retrieve.
The SPOT Messenger is 3.7″ x 2.6″ x 1″ (9.4 cm x 6.6 cm x 2.5 cm) and weighs 5.2 oz (147.4 g).
ASCHG hike leaders (or van drivers) are required to carry a SPOT Messenger (that belongs to the center) on our hikes so they can send arrival/departure messages back to the center. That way, the person in charge of the center doesn’t get all stressed out if we’re going to be a little late getting back.
Okay… okay… I can understand that logic. However, I have told a couple of people that, in my opinion, someone on each hike should be carrying an ACR ResQLink, as well, because, in my estimation, a personal locator beacon is more dependable in an emergency. I mean, I can’t go on every single hike! 😉 I have convinced at least one hike leader and he now owns an ACR ResQLink, and two other hikers (one is also a hike leader) are also considering the purchase of an ACR ResQLink for themselves.
NOTE: One hike leader who carries a SPOT has told me that, whenever he gets under tree cover, his SPOT loses its satellite connection and stops working, and he has to wait until he gets back out in the open before it starts working again.
Bottom Line: Of the three, the ACR ResQLink that doesn’t float is the lightest. The weights of the other two are about the same. However, the ACR ResQLinks have a smaller form factor, which I prefer, since it is hanging from my shoulder strap.
.
So What’s A Hiker/Backpacker To Do?
From my perspective, the deeper you venture into the wilderness, the more remote that wilderness is, and the longer you stay, the more you should consider buying a personal locator beacon, especially if you tend to hike solo.
I am mainly a day hiker, but I have done some backpacking and I am gearing up to do more. Anything can happen in the wilderness that might constitute a life-or-death situation for you or someone in your hiking group, even on simple day hikes. Should that happen, and self-rescue or group-rescue is impossible, what would you do?
I would never rely on cell phones working in the back country, so if there is an emergency that requires rescue, without a personal locator beacon, someone would have to hike out and get help. That “hike out” prospect, along with the time it would take to return with help, is what should get your attention because, in a life-or-death situation, time can be the critical factor in determining whether a person (or the entire group) lives or dies. And if you hike solo… well, for me, the decision to buy a personal locator beacon was a no-brainer.
.
Which Unit Is Best For You?
Now you’re on your own!
However, when I go into the wilderness, I want to get away from the city and from people. Other than leaving my itinerary with someone I trust, along with instructions on what to do if I’m overdue, I don’t want people tracking my every move on some map. And I don’t want to send “Okay” messages at regular intervals. I want to be left alone to enjoy the wilderness! That’s why I went out there in the first place. 🙂
You may be different. Your family may insist you send “Okay” messages at regular intervals. You may even want to send “Okay” messages at regular intervals. Your family may want to track your progress on a map. You may even want them to track your progress on a map. So make a decision that falls within your comfort zone and the comfort zone of your family — but only AFTER you carefully consider ALL the pros and cons of each unit.
.
Which Unit Should You Count On In A Life-or-Death Emergency?
Now we’re getting to the meat of the matter. Based on my research, when it comes to a life-threatening emergency in the wilderness where rescue is required and time is of the essence, the ACR ResQLink’s distress signal has the best chance of getting through in the shortest amount of time and in a variety of environmental conditions. Once received, that distress signal will be handled by the best, proven rescue protocol in the country. And that timeliness and rescue protocol will give you your best chance for the shortest signal-to-rescue time possible.
In deciding, keep this is mind:
When it comes to rescue beacons, you want a HIGH power, LOWER-frequency device. A real PLB, such as the ACR ResQLink, is just such a device.
On the other hand, a SPOT is a LOW power, HIGHER-frequency device, which is exactly the opposite of what you want in a rescue beacon.
In closing, let me drive home the message of this article with a SPOT Reality Check, and then I will leave you to your thoughts.
.
A SPOT Reality Check
April 28, 2012
Yacht Race from Newport Beach, California to Ensenada, Baja California
The Aegean entry had four crew members aboard.
The skipper of the boat had a SPOT and GPS Tracking was enabled.
The SPOT’s SOS distress signal was activated around 1:30 AM.
GEOS Alliance received the Aegean‘s distress signal but made no attempt to contact the Coast Guard even though the Aegean‘s GPS tracking data clearly showed they were in trouble.
The Aegean apparently grounded on rugged North Coronado Island in the middle of the night.
All four crew members died.
40 responses to “Why I Bought A PLB (Or… Why I Didn’t Buy A SPOT)”
Larry
June 8th, 2018 at 05:39
Can you send me a private email.
George
June 8th, 2018 at 07:25
You can PM me on Facebook.
Larry
May 30th, 2018 at 10:05
I have the CR123A batteries with tabs installed. You can make your own battery pack.
George
May 30th, 2018 at 13:15
Where did you get the batteries with tabs installed… or did you put them on yourself?
I know how to make a DIY spot welder, but don’t want to go through all that for only one battery pack if I can get Batteries Plus to do it for a reasonable price.
Larry
May 27th, 2018 at 18:05
Any luck on battery pack. I have found the cr batteries with tabs already on. Not sure how to connect the wires to plug into the PLB. The cost for new batteries is not reasonable. I am using mine as a spare. I have heard if u try to weld to batteries it will drain power. I will find a solution just curious what you have found. Thanks
George
May 27th, 2018 at 18:39
Haven’t gotten around to it, yet. And, I agree, everything I have read says you can’t just solder the wires on the batteries using a regular soldering iron because the heat will hurt/destroy the batteries.
However, this is what I plan to do and, if it works, I’ll update my post.
I have been told that Batteries Plus has everything needed to build battery packs — spot welders, shrink wrap, nickel strips, etc. They will build a battery pack (I think for free) if you buy the batteries from them. Pretty sure you have to bring in your old pack so they can reuse the wire connector.
Here’s the rub: Batteries Plus does not sell Panasonic CR123A batteries. They sell CR123A batteries they “claim” are made by Panasonic. Not only that, but there is no date stamped on their batteries to indicate when those batteries were manufactured. I guess they don’t want you to know you might be buying batteries that have been on the shelf for many, many years. Since a PLB is a life-saving device, I don’t trust using their batteries.
Here’s what I plan to do, when I have time: I am going to buy my own Panasonic CR123A batteries from someplace (?) that will guarantee the date stamp will show the batteries have been manufactured in the past 12 months. Then I will call Batteries Plus and ask them how much they will charge to make a battery pack out of my Panasonic batteries. If they will do that, I will take my new batteries and old battery pack down and have them make me a new one.
If they tell me they only make battery packs for people who buy their batteries, I will offer to buy three of their batteries, but have them use my Panasonic batteries to make the pack, instead. Not sure if that will work, but I’m going to give it a try.
If they still won’t do it, then I guess I’ll have to make my own spot welder and figure out how to safely solder wires on a battery.
If you decide to give Batteries Plus a try, let me know how it goes.
Bill Cole
September 22nd, 2019 at 15:06
Batteries PLUS won’t make a battery pack for a “Life Saving Device”. Simply make up a story about what you want the battery pack for, something like a home made burglar alarm.
George
September 22nd, 2019 at 15:57
I didn’t know that. Thanks for the heads up! 🙂
Linda McCormick
October 30th, 2016 at 12:54
I’m a senior hiker and normally hike with other seniors in groups. Shame on me, I had never heard of PLBs. Thank you very much for the PLB analyses and all the comments. I will be buying a ACR ResQLink+ soon. Linda Mc
George
October 30th, 2016 at 23:25
Hey, Linda…
You are very welcome!
Are you the one I talked to after the lecture at the North Domingo Baca Center a few days back? If so, I’m glad you were able to find my PLB article because I messed up the address I gave you for my blog. 😦 My apology for that.
And I think you made a good decision to start hiking with a PLB. Better safe than sorry.
Thanks very much for your visit! 🙂
George
Rob
December 8th, 2015 at 22:41
One other thing to consider is the way Spot does business. I purchased a 2 year service plan and paid for it in advance. Roll forward two years and suddenly without any notice I get a $361 charge on my credit card. The card I used had been stolen about a year ago and I had a new number which Spot managed to get a hold of. So without my permission, without any notice, and after 2 years they charge me for another 2 years (which I don’t want). The bank says they cant do anything since it’s a “reoccurring charge” and Spot does not answer the phone during the hours they claim to. Not sure what to do now except maybe file in small claims court. This is not a company I ever want to do business with again. Get a PLB from ACR and avoid this giant rip off.
George
December 9th, 2015 at 11:52
Sorry to hear about your bad experience with SPOT, Rob. That’s why I never allow recurring charges on my card (except for my cell service)… or allow anyone to take money directly out of my account. Once you get into those agreements, it often takes an act of god to get you out of them. Hope you get it worked out with them. Appreciate your visit and your comment.
Anonymous
December 9th, 2015 at 12:50
Thanks George, I did work it out but it took some persistence. I have not seen the refund yet so we shall see. I ordered a new PLB-375 for $100 less than the 2 year subscription and I agree with your analysis above. They make a lot more sense for what I am using it for – serious emergency in a sea-plane. Thanks for the great blog!
George
December 9th, 2015 at 12:56
Good for you. Hope you got the one that floats! 🙂
And thanks for the compliment. Appreciate it!
Anonymous
December 9th, 2015 at 13:23
Thanks, and yes it floats….
Dean Smith
April 23rd, 2015 at 10:19
interesting and informative.
George
April 23rd, 2015 at 14:44
Thanks, Dean. Glad you found the information useful, and appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment.
tweederjohnson
July 20th, 2014 at 17:33
Out of curiosity, any idea of what a SAR event will cost someone who has to use one? Does it differ between the SPOT and the PLB? I realize that there is a lot of variation depending on the length of the search, types of injuries sustained, etc. I’m just looking for a ballpark figure. Thanks!
George
July 20th, 2014 at 18:04
I believe most states eat the SAR cost involving hikers. I don’t believe National Parks or National Forests bill the hiker for SAR costs, either. Some states, such as New Hampshire, try to recover SAR costs if the hiker gets lost and/or injured through their own negligence, and also sells voluntary “Hike Safe” cards to help offset SAR costs. Colorado also offers a card to help offset SAR costs.
As to the cost of rescue, there are too many variables to come up with a ballpark figure. However, if a helicopter is involved, I’ve read they cost $10k per day! So it wouldn’t surprise me if the cost of a three-day SAR ran anywhere from $10k to $50k.
I don’t think the type of locator beacon you activate affects SAR costs because the same group of people will be involved in the rescue effort. However, I have heard that SPOT offers their owners an insurance policy to offset SAR costs but I don’t have any details about that policy.
Anonymous
July 20th, 2014 at 21:07
Thanks for the info and the quick response!
George
July 21st, 2014 at 08:54
No problem. Thanks for your visit.
Anonymous
June 21st, 2014 at 16:04
Anyone know about the 406 users “club”?
George
June 22nd, 2014 at 05:32
Sorry, haven’t heard of one.
john
June 21st, 2014 at 15:25
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-rainier-hiker-20140621-story.html
john
June 21st, 2014 at 15:25
Looks like this lady could have used one.
George
June 22nd, 2014 at 05:35
Sometimes wilderness accidents happen so fast there isn’t time to activate a PLB. I suspect that’s what happened to her. And I wouldn’t be surprised to find out she was carrying a PLB, given who she was.
JTB
June 17th, 2014 at 22:54
Buying a PLB…decision made, thanks for the review!
George
June 18th, 2014 at 08:09
You’re more than welcome and I think you’ve made a good decision. And thanks for taking the time to leave a comment.
rg
March 30th, 2014 at 18:33
Thanks for a carefully thought out, well presented, rational presentation of the pros and cons of each device. I, too, contemplate more solo hikes in the Nevada desert and have been reviewing all of the available devices. I had looked at and downgraded the ACR device in favor of the SPOT or In-Reach by Delorme. Now back to the drawing board to reevaluate the ACR PLB. I am a senior hiker and having access to SAR is important to me and my family.
George
March 31st, 2014 at 07:13
I’m glad you found value in my PLB/SPOT article, RG. IMO, anyone going into the wilderness should carry a real PLB. And once you’ve made your selection, I’m sure your family will appreciate it. Thank you for the compliment and for taking time to leave a comment.
David
March 7th, 2014 at 15:26
I just bought and registered one. Thanks again, George.
George
March 7th, 2014 at 16:11
Good to hear… and you are more than welcome.
Safe riding to you, David.
David
March 3rd, 2014 at 23:06
Great info. A lot of us mtn. bikers are looking into them after the death of a solo biker in so cal who only had a cell phone. It took SAR about 16 hours to find him and he was dead by then. I hike, trail run, bike and ocean fish from a boat, so it’s about time I looked into one. Thanks for the article!
George
March 4th, 2014 at 07:36
Yesterday, in my blog stats, I noticed my PLB article was getting a lot of attention. By the end of the day, it had been viewed 105 times, which is a pretty extreme number for my blog. I followed the referring domain back to SoCal Trail Riders and found the reason for all the interest.
As a small-time, occasional blogger, I appreciate the interest in my PLB article, but I am sad that interest came from the loss of one in your South California mountain trail riding community. If you happen to read this, please extend my condolences to the other riders in your forum, and my thoughts are with the lost rider’s family and friends.
And I sincerely hope you, and the other riders in your forum, follow through on plans to buy and carry a real PLB. Although there is no such thing as a “guaranteed rescue,” a real PLB will give you your best chance of rescue and survival should things go wrong during a wilderness ride.
However, a PLB should not be the only item in a survival kit. As you and the other riders on your forum now realize, SAR will typically not mount a rescue attempt if they feel conditions will put the rescuers in danger. So it is important for anyone going into the wilderness to carry whatever they need to survive on their own for 48 hours while they await rescue.
I wish you safe riding, and I thank you for taking the time to express your appreciation for my article.
David
March 5th, 2014 at 02:03
Hi George, yes one of the guys found your info very insightful and posted a link. Thanks for sending your condolences. Most of us on STR didn’t know him but the news hit us pretty hard. I almost talked myself out of buying one after making the decision to get one. Your comment here about following through got me back on track.
George
March 5th, 2014 at 08:58
To keep you on track, consider this:
There is bound to be at least one person in your life who loves you so much they would be extremely distressed at the thought of you lying banged up and helpless along side of some remote mountain trail… and would be absolutely heart broken and devastated were they to lose you forever, especially like that.
Now go to that person, tell them about the mountain biker who just lost his life, and ask that person whether they would like you to carry a PLB as part of your survival kit whenever you ride.
Decision made.
Jim Burke
July 24th, 2013 at 16:53
I’ve been going back and forth myself and have been leaning the ACR way too. Thanks for your write up.
George
July 24th, 2013 at 17:41
I’m glad you found the article helpful, Jim. I don’t think you can go wrong with the ACR ResQLink… as long as you don’t mind paying the piper when it comes time to replace the battery! I appreciate your comment, as well.
George
July 12th, 2013 at 05:37
You are more than welcome, Capt. Mike. I appreciate the comment and wish you and your friends calm seas.
captnmike
July 11th, 2013 at 23:20
Nice article – sent it on to some friends
thanks